Marc,
> memcpy_fromio() doesn't provide any control over access size.
> For example, on arm64, it is implemented using readb and readq.
> This may trigger a synchronous external abort:
Applied to 5.0/scsi-fixes, thanks.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:29 AM Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
> memcpy_fromio() doesn't provide any control over access size.
> For example, on arm64, it is implemented using readb and readq.
> This may trigger a synchronous external abort:
>
> [3.729943] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 9
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 06:29:22PM +0100, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> memcpy_fromio() doesn't provide any control over access size.
> For example, on arm64, it is implemented using readb and readq.
> This may trigger a synchronous external abort:
>
> [3.729943] Internal error: synchronous external
On Tue 22 Jan 09:29 PST 2019, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> memcpy_fromio() doesn't provide any control over access size.
> For example, on arm64, it is implemented using readb and readq.
> This may trigger a synchronous external abort:
>
> [3.729943] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 9600
memcpy_fromio() doesn't provide any control over access size.
For example, on arm64, it is implemented using readb and readq.
This may trigger a synchronous external abort:
[3.729943] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
[3.737000] Modules linked in:
[
>
> On 09/01/2019 16:38, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>
> >> On 11/12/2018 15:18, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> >>
> >>> memcpy_fromio() doesn't provide any control over access size.
> >>> For example, on arm64, it is implemented using readb and readq.
> >>> This may trigger a synchronous external abort:
> >>>
>
On 09/01/2019 16:38, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>> On 11/12/2018 15:18, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>>> memcpy_fromio() doesn't provide any control over access size.
>>> For example, on arm64, it is implemented using readb and readq.
>>> This may trigger a synchronous external abort:
>>>
>>> [3.729943] I
On 1/9/2019 5:42 AM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
Bjorn, Andy, Jeffrey,
What do you think about the patch below?
Regards.
On 11/12/2018 15:18, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
memcpy_fromio() doesn't provide any control over access size.
For example, on arm64, it is implemented using readb and readq.
This may t
Bjorn, Andy, Jeffrey,
What do you think about the patch below?
Regards.
On 11/12/2018 15:18, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> memcpy_fromio() doesn't provide any control over access size.
> For example, on arm64, it is implemented using readb and readq.
> This may trigger a synchronous external abort:
>
On 13/12/2018 23:34, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> On 11/12/2018 15:18, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>
>> Fixes: ba80917d9932d ("scsi: ufs: ufshcd_dump_regs to use memcpy_fromio")
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez
>
> LGTM
Vinayak, Joao,
What do you think?
Regards.
> memcpy_fromio() doesn't provide any control over access size.
> For example, on arm64, it is implemented using readb and readq.
> This may trigger a synchronous external abort:
>
> [3.729943] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1]
> PREEMPT SMP
> [3.737000] Modules l
memcpy_fromio() doesn't provide any control over access size.
For example, on arm64, it is implemented using readb and readq.
This may trigger a synchronous external abort:
[3.729943] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1]
PREEMPT SMP
[3.737000] Modules linked in:
[
12 matches
Mail list logo