Ming,
> This patch doesn't depend on patch 1~8, so please take it via scsi
> tree if you are fine.
Applied, thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 2:57 PM Ming Lei wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 08:04:40PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >
> > Ming,
> >
> > > scsi_device's refcount is always grabbed in IO path.
> > >
> > > Turns out it isn't necessary, because blk_queue_cleanup() will
> > > drain any in-flight
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 08:04:40PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Ming,
>
> > scsi_device's refcount is always grabbed in IO path.
> >
> > Turns out it isn't necessary, because blk_queue_cleanup() will
> > drain any in-flight IOs, then cancel timeout/requeue work, and
> > SCSI's requeue_wor
Ming,
> scsi_device's refcount is always grabbed in IO path.
>
> Turns out it isn't necessary, because blk_queue_cleanup() will
> drain any in-flight IOs, then cancel timeout/requeue work, and
> SCSI's requeue_work is canceled too in __scsi_remove_device().
>
> Also scsi_device won't go away unt
On 4/12/19 5:30 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
scsi_device's refcount is always grabbed in IO path.
Turns out it isn't necessary, because blk_queue_cleanup() will
drain any in-flight IOs, then cancel timeout/requeue work, and
SCSI's requeue_work is canceled too in __scsi_remove_device().
Also scsi_device
scsi_device's refcount is always grabbed in IO path.
Turns out it isn't necessary, because blk_queue_cleanup() will
drain any in-flight IOs, then cancel timeout/requeue work, and
SCSI's requeue_work is canceled too in __scsi_remove_device().
Also scsi_device won't go away until blk_cleanup_queue(
6 matches
Mail list logo