On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 12:35:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> What's the transition plan for userspace? If you look at glibc
> currently, it supplies both scsi.h and scsi_ioctl.h. If we're
> persuading the glibc folks to go with our versions from uapi, I think
> removing a file which is an e
On 01/08/2015 12:35 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 11:47 -0800, Andy Grover wrote:
Now that we have uapi/scsi/scsi.h, that is the logical place for SCSI ioctl
definitions to go. The kernel-specific stuff that remains is so little that
it can be folded into scsi/scsi.h, and scsi
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 11:47 -0800, Andy Grover wrote:
> Now that we have uapi/scsi/scsi.h, that is the logical place for SCSI ioctl
> definitions to go. The kernel-specific stuff that remains is so little that
> it can be folded into scsi/scsi.h, and scsi_ioctl.h removed.
>
> Remove all scsi_ioctl
Now that we have uapi/scsi/scsi.h, that is the logical place for SCSI ioctl
definitions to go. The kernel-specific stuff that remains is so little that
it can be folded into scsi/scsi.h, and scsi_ioctl.h removed.
Remove all scsi_ioctl.h #includes since they all also include scsi/scsi.h,
except for
4 matches
Mail list logo
