Re: [PATCH 22/24] scsi: eesox: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

2012-09-18 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 17 September 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > In both of my replies, I've said "as x86 does". We need to follow > x86's behaviour here, which is as I've quoted - it's not a matter > that "I need to make up my mind" - my mind is already well made up. > That is, we need to follow x8

Re: [PATCH 22/24] scsi: eesox: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

2012-09-17 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:30:43AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 15 September 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 08:00:35AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Friday 14 September 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34

Re: [PATCH 22/24] scsi: eesox: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

2012-09-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Saturday 15 September 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 08:00:35AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 14 September 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:50PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > ARM is moving to stricter che

Re: [PATCH 22/24] scsi: eesox: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

2012-09-15 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 08:00:35AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 14 September 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:50PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions, > > > so we need to use the correct types

Re: [PATCH 22/24] scsi: eesox: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

2012-09-15 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 14 September 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:50PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions, > > so we need to use the correct types everywhere. > > There's nothing wrong with const iomem pointers. If

Re: [PATCH 22/24] scsi: eesox: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

2012-09-14 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34:50PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions, > so we need to use the correct types everywhere. There's nothing wrong with const iomem pointers. If you think otherwise, patch x86 not to use const in its accessor impleme

[PATCH 22/24] scsi: eesox: use __iomem pointers for MMIO

2012-09-14 Thread Arnd Bergmann
ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions, so we need to use the correct types everywhere. Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann --- drivers/scsi/arm/eesox.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/d