Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] bugfix for an overflow condition in usb storage & isd200.c

2008-02-01 Thread Mark Glines
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008 21:37:13 +0200 Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mark - This is for you on top of vanila v2.6.24 kernel from Linus. Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner. This fixes the issue I was having. > --- > > scsi_scan is issuing a 36-byte INQUIRY request to llds. isd20

Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] bugfix for an overflow condition in usb storage & isd200.c

2008-01-31 Thread Matthew Dharm
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:05:19PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31 2008 at 21:49 +0200, Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No. No no no. > > Please re-inspect the code again. > There is no device involved here. The code completely emulates this commands > with a driver made

Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] bugfix for an overflow condition in usb storage & isd200.c

2008-01-31 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On Thu, Jan 31 2008 at 21:49 +0200, Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No. No no no. > > The ISD200 code was written by the ISD200 developers. I really don't want > to go mucking about changing what commands actually get send to the ISD200 > parts. We have no idea if the will reliably a

Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] bugfix for an overflow condition in usb storage & isd200.c

2008-01-31 Thread Matthew Dharm
No. No no no. The ISD200 code was written by the ISD200 developers. I really don't want to go mucking about changing what commands actually get send to the ISD200 parts. We have no idea if the will reliably accept a 36-byte INQUIRY. Just because it happens to work for a couple of people doesn'

[PATCH 2.6.24] bugfix for an overflow condition in usb storage & isd200.c

2008-01-31 Thread Boaz Harrosh
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rote: > As this is a regression and hits 2.6.24, can you send the final version > of this patch to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address so we can get it into the > 2.6.24.y tree? > > thanks, > > greg k-h Mark - This is for you on top of vanila v2.6.24 kernel from Linus. ---