Re: [PATCH 2/9] lpfc: Fix -EOVERFLOW behavior for NVMET and defer_rcv

2017-12-13 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 12/09/2017 02:18 AM, James Smart wrote: > The driver is all set to handle the defer_rcv api for the > nvmet_fc transport, yet didn't properly recognize the return > status when the defer_rcv occurred. The driver treated it simply > as an error and aborted the io. Several residual issues occurred

[PATCH 2/9] lpfc: Fix -EOVERFLOW behavior for NVMET and defer_rcv

2017-12-08 Thread James Smart
The driver is all set to handle the defer_rcv api for the nvmet_fc transport, yet didn't properly recognize the return status when the defer_rcv occurred. The driver treated it simply as an error and aborted the io. Several residual issues occurred at that point. Finish the defer_rcv support: reco