On 4/1/2014 8:40 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
So no way to get it centralized?
Yes, still working on how that might look..
I still don't understand the iscsi/iser constraint.
Every other fabric aside from iscsi/iser could simply provide a
TFO->get_fabric_prot(se_tpg) to query for supp
On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 11:04 +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> On 4/1/2014 4:11 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>
> +
> +if (scsi_host_get_prot(lport->qla_vha->host)) {
> +tpg->se_tpg.fabric_sup_prot_type = (TARGET_DIF_TYPE0_PROT|
> +TARGET_DIF_T
On 4/1/2014 4:11 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
+
+if (scsi_host_get_prot(lport->qla_vha->host)) {
+tpg->se_tpg.fabric_sup_prot_type = (TARGET_DIF_TYPE0_PROT|
+TARGET_DIF_TYPE1_PROT|TARGET_DIF_TYPE2_PROT|
+TARGET_DIF_TYPE3_PROT);
+
+
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 15:38 +, Quinn Tran wrote:
> On 3/28/14 5:12 PM, "sagi grimberg" wrote:
>
> >On 3/29/2014 2:05 AM, Quinn Tran wrote:
> >> Set Protection Type(1,2,3) capabilities, Guarg type (CRC/IPchksm)
> >> capabilities bits to let TCM core knows of HW/fabric capabilities.
> >>
> >>
Regards,
Quinn Tran
On 3/28/14 5:12 PM, "sagi grimberg" wrote:
>On 3/29/2014 2:05 AM, Quinn Tran wrote:
>> Set Protection Type(1,2,3) capabilities, Guarg type (CRC/IPchksm)
>> capabilities bits to let TCM core knows of HW/fabric capabilities.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger
>> Signe
On 3/29/2014 2:05 AM, Quinn Tran wrote:
Set Protection Type(1,2,3) capabilities, Guarg type (CRC/IPchksm)
capabilities bits to let TCM core knows of HW/fabric capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger
Signed-off-by: Giridhar Malavali
---
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c | 23
Set Protection Type(1,2,3) capabilities, Guarg type (CRC/IPchksm)
capabilities bits to let TCM core knows of HW/fabric capabilities.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger
Signed-off-by: Giridhar Malavali
---
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_qla2xxx.c | 23 +++
drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/tcm_q
7 matches
Mail list logo
