On Fri, Nov 02 2007 at 13:17 +0200, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 08:32:12AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> I agree this is probably the cleanest implementation but when Boaz and I
>> initially discussed this approach he convinced me that LL block devices
>> as
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 08:32:12AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> I agree this is probably the cleanest implementation but when Boaz and I
> initially discussed this approach he convinced me that LL block devices assume
> that req->cmd_len <= BLK_MAX_CDB and it is unsafe at the moment to expose them
On Nov. 01, 2007, 20:40 +0200, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:05:06PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> @@ -287,8 +287,13 @@ struct request {
>> /*
>> * when request is used as a packet command carrier
>> */
>> -unsigned int cmd_len;
>> +
On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:05:06PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> @@ -287,8 +287,13 @@ struct request {
> /*
>* when request is used as a packet command carrier
>*/
> - unsigned int cmd_len;
> + unsigned short cmd_len;
> + unsigned short varlen_cdb_len; /* length of
- add varlen_cdb and varlen_cdb_len to hold a large user cdb
if needed. They start as empty. Allocation of buffer must
be done by user and held until request execution is done.
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
block/ll_rw_blk.c |2 ++
include/linux/blkdev.h
5 matches
Mail list logo
