[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:05 +0200:
> You are most probably right I will investigate what happened. It looks
> like I went back to some old version right? or a merge fallout
> Thanks for reviewing.
>
> Please also test latest head-of-line code if possible + iscsi patches
> + l
On Mon, Feb 11 2008 at 17:43 +0200, Pete Wyckoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:29 +0200:
>> iscsi bidi support at the generic libiscsi level
>> - prepare the additional bidi_read rlength header.
>> - access the right scsi_in() and/or scsi_out() si
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:29 +0200:
> iscsi bidi support at the generic libiscsi level
> - prepare the additional bidi_read rlength header.
> - access the right scsi_in() and/or scsi_out() side of things.
> also for resid.
> - Handle BIDI underflow overflow from tar
iscsi bidi support at the generic libiscsi level
- prepare the additional bidi_read rlength header.
- access the right scsi_in() and/or scsi_out() side of things.
also for resid.
- Handle BIDI underflow overflow from target
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/
4 matches
Mail list logo