Hi,
On 10/03/2014 10:47 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 09:25:50AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
>> OK, so 3.17 should be on sunday giving three days or so to sort this
>> out. If you're happy with blk-mq being disabled so the bug never
>> triggers unless the user activates
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 09:25:50AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> OK, so 3.17 should be on sunday giving three days or so to sort this
> out. If you're happy with blk-mq being disabled so the bug never
> triggers unless the user activates it, doing nothing is my preferred
> outcome ... but that a
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 06:12:59AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:08:40PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Yes, although that likely would need to go through stable, without
> > going into 3.18 .
> >
> > Greg, is this ok with you and how do I get a patch in stable whic
Hi,
On 10/02/2014 03:25 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 15:18 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/02/2014 03:12 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:08:40PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Yes, although that likely would need to go through stab
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 15:18 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/02/2014 03:12 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:08:40PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> Yes, although that likely would need to go through stable, without
> >> going into 3.18 .
> >>
> >> Greg, is th
Hi,
On 10/02/2014 03:12 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:08:40PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Yes, although that likely would need to go through stable, without
>> going into 3.18 .
>>
>> Greg, is this ok with you and how do I get a patch in stable which
>> is not in ups
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:08:40PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Yes, although that likely would need to go through stable, without
> going into 3.18 .
>
> Greg, is this ok with you and how do I get a patch in stable which
> is not in upstream (because upstream will get a better fix) ?
This is a
Hi,
On 10/02/2014 03:06 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:35:10PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> This patch sits on top of a whole bunch of uas cleanups / fixes which
>> are going into 3.18, and which are to big of a change to backport.
>
> Can add a patch to set disable_b
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 02:35:10PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> This patch sits on top of a whole bunch of uas cleanups / fixes which
> are going into 3.18, and which are to big of a change to backport.
Can add a patch to set disable_blk_mq for uas on 3.17 then?
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hi,
On 10/02/2014 01:26 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Looks fine to me (and actually removes code..)
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
>
> It's fairly late in 3.17 to get something like this in, but would you
> consider Ccing it to stable so we can get it into the first 3.17 stable
> release?
Looks fine to me (and actually removes code..)
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
It's fairly late in 3.17 to get something like this in, but would you
consider Ccing it to stable so we can get it into the first 3.17 stable
release?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
With uas over usb-3 the tags inside the uas iu-s must match the usb-3 stream
ids, and those go from 1 - qdepth.
Before blk-mq calling scsi_activate_tcq(sdev, qdepth) guaranteed that we would
only get cmnd->request->tag from 0 - (qdepth - 1), and we used those as
uas-tags / stream-ids.
With blk-mq
12 matches
Mail list logo
