On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 08:17:21AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> I updated the previous patch for your latest patchset. I removed the
> sg chaining support so you can send it to scsi-misc now.
>
> Just a one-line patch is necessary for the sg chaining support. It'll
> be push to mainline via Jen
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:03:50 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 07:41:06AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:31:34 -0600
> > Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:39:05AM -0500, James Bottomley
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 07:41:06AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:31:34 -0600
> Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:39:05AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > I get a compile failure at this point in your patch sequence:
> >
> > Than
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 09:31:34 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:39:05AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > I get a compile failure at this point in your patch sequence:
>
> Thanks. I'd been compiling with CONFIG_ISA=n, so hadn't spotted these
> two proble
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:39:05AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> I get a compile failure at this point in your patch sequence:
Thanks. I'd been compiling with CONFIG_ISA=n, so hadn't spotted these
two problems. I've set it back to Y now.
> I've put 1-15 in .. could you rebase against scsi-mis
On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 08:56 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Rearrange a lot of the functions in the file to get rid of all the
> forward
> declarations.
I get a compile failure at this point in your patch sequence:
CC [M] drivers/scsi/advansys.o
drivers/scsi/advansys.c:72:2: warning: #warning t
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 11:29:34AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> What thoughts, if any, have been given to post-patch code arrangement,
> besides eliminating prototypes?
> This always struck me as a counterproductive exercise when taken by
> itself.
Eliminating prototypes saves me from an extra go
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Rearrange a lot of the functions in the file to get rid of all the forward
declarations.
What thoughts, if any, have been given to post-patch code arrangement,
besides eliminating prototypes?
This always struck me as a counterproductive exercise when taken by
itself.
8 matches
Mail list logo