RE: [PATCH 11/41] scsi: bfa: bfa_fcs_rport: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

: bfa: bfa_fcs_rport: Mark expected switch fall-throughs External Email Hi, Friendly ping (second one): Who can ack/review/take this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 12/19/18 9:39 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Hi, > > Friendly ping: > > Who can ack or review this patch, ple

Re: [PATCH 11/41] scsi: bfa: bfa_fcs_rport: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

Hi, Friendly ping (second one): Who can ack/review/take this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 12/19/18 9:39 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: Hi, Friendly ping: Who can ack or review this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/27/18 10:27 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: In preparation to

Re: [PATCH 11/41] scsi: bfa: bfa_fcs_rport: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

Hi, Friendly ping: Who can ack or review this patch, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/27/18 10:27 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that I replaced "!! fall through !!" and "!!! fa

[PATCH 11/41] scsi: bfa: bfa_fcs_rport: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that I replaced "!! fall through !!" and "!!! fall through !!!" comments with "fall through" annotations, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 744899 ("Mis