On Tuesday 29 May 2007 17:54, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 10:51 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 15:55 +0200, Swen Schillig wrote:
> > > I just saw that I posted this patch on 9th already,
> > > but todays git pull from your tree didn't show the inclusion
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 10:51 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 15:55 +0200, Swen Schillig wrote:
> > I just saw that I posted this patch on 9th already,
> > but todays git pull from your tree didn't show the inclusion of this one
> > (and another patch posted the same day).
> >
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 15:55 +0200, Swen Schillig wrote:
> I just saw that I posted this patch on 9th already,
> but todays git pull from your tree didn't show the inclusion of this one (and
> another patch posted the same day).
> Event though it's reported in your summary from the 26 !
> If I'm t
James
I just saw that I posted this patch on 9th already,
but todays git pull from your tree didn't show the inclusion of this one (and
another patch posted the same day).
Event though it's reported in your summary from the 26 !
If I'm to quick then I'm sorry for sending it twice, if there's any
From: Michael Loehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Devices corresponding to a deleted unit are never freed.
This has the effect that slave_destroy is never called and zfcp
'thinks' that this unit is still registered.
This patch changes the zfcp behaviour the way that the
rport and sdev are not deleted anymor
5 matches
Mail list logo
