Hi James,
I've gotten mail that you have accepted patches 2/3 and 3/3 from this series.
This one has been accepted by Steve also, so please consider taking also this
1/3.
Thanks, Tomas
On 08/01/2013 03:11 PM, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> From: Tomas Henzl
>
> The cmd_pool_bits is protected everywhe
On 08/06/2013 05:46 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 01:13:59PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>> On 08/01/2013 06:18 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 05:39:36PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 05:19 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 01:13:59PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 06:18 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 05:39:36PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> >> On 08/01/2013 05:19 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> Btw. on line 1284 - isn't i
On 08/01/2013 06:18 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 05:39:36PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>> On 08/01/2013 05:19 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> [...]
>
Btw. on line 1284 - isn't it similar to patch 2/3 ?
> ^^^ Oh, missed this the first time around, the
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 05:39:36PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 05:19 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
[...]
> >> Btw. on line 1284 - isn't it similar to patch 2/3 ?
^^^ Oh, missed this the first time around, the sop driver uses the
make_request_fn()
interface, and it's not a
On 08/01/2013 05:19 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:59:45PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>> On 08/01/2013 04:21 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
On 08/01/2013 03:39 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:59:45PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 04:21 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> >> On 08/01/2013 03:39 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:11:22PM +0200,
On 08/01/2013 04:21 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>> On 08/01/2013 03:39 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:11:22PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
From: Tomas Henzl
The cmd_pool_bit
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:05:20PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 03:39 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:11:22PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> >> From: Tomas Henzl
> >>
> >> The cmd_pool_bits is protected everywhere with a spinlock,
> >> we don't need
On 08/01/2013 03:39 PM, scame...@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:11:22PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
>> From: Tomas Henzl
>>
>> The cmd_pool_bits is protected everywhere with a spinlock,
>> we don't need the test_and_set_bit, set_bit is enough and the loop
>> can be removed t
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 03:11:22PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote:
> From: Tomas Henzl
>
> The cmd_pool_bits is protected everywhere with a spinlock,
> we don't need the test_and_set_bit, set_bit is enough and the loop
> can be removed too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Henzl
> ---
> drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
From: Tomas Henzl
The cmd_pool_bits is protected everywhere with a spinlock,
we don't need the test_and_set_bit, set_bit is enough and the loop
can be removed too.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Henzl
---
drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --
12 matches
Mail list logo
