RE: [PATCH 1/3] bsg: Make job reply size different than SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE

Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:02:42AM +0200, Avri Altman wrote: > > The size of the bsg job reply was set to SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE back then > > while it was part of the bsg_command. However, for the scsi transport > > that uses it, it does not carry the scsi sense information. > > > > Rename

Re: [PATCH 1/3] bsg: Make job reply size different than SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:02:42AM +0200, Avri Altman wrote: > The size of the bsg job reply was set to SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE back then > while it was part of the bsg_command. However, for the scsi transport > that uses it, it does not carry the scsi sense information. > > Rename it to clarify thi

[PATCH 1/3] bsg: Make job reply size different than SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE

The size of the bsg job reply was set to SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE back then while it was part of the bsg_command. However, for the scsi transport that uses it, it does not carry the scsi sense information. Rename it to clarify this point, and while at it, make it a little bit larger, so it'll be able