On Thu, Jul 18 2019 at 9:35pm -0400,
Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:52:01AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17 2019 at 11:25pm -0400,
> > Ming Lei wrote:
> >
> > > dm-rq needs to free request which has been dispatched and not completed
> > > by underlying queue. Howeve
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:52:01AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17 2019 at 11:25pm -0400,
> Ming Lei wrote:
>
> > dm-rq needs to free request which has been dispatched and not completed
> > by underlying queue. However, the underlying queue may have allocated
> > private stuff for thi
On Wed, Jul 17 2019 at 11:25pm -0400,
Ming Lei wrote:
> dm-rq needs to free request which has been dispatched and not completed
> by underlying queue. However, the underlying queue may have allocated
> private stuff for this request in .queue_rq(), so dm-rq will leak the
> request private part.
dm-rq needs to free request which has been dispatched and not completed
by underlying queue. However, the underlying queue may have allocated
private stuff for this request in .queue_rq(), so dm-rq will leak the
request private part.
Add one new callback of .cleanup_rq() to fix the memory leak iss
4 matches
Mail list logo
