On 09/06/2015 08:16 AM, Lee Duncan wrote:
> On 09/06/2015 12:34 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>> On 9/5/2015 11:44 PM, Lee Duncan wrote:
>>> Each Scsi_host instance gets a host number starting
>>> at 0, but this was implemented with an atomic integer,
>>> and rollover wasn't considered. Another problem
On 09/06/2015 12:34 AM, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> On 9/5/2015 11:44 PM, Lee Duncan wrote:
>> Each Scsi_host instance gets a host number starting
>> at 0, but this was implemented with an atomic integer,
>> and rollover wasn't considered. Another problem with
>> this design is that scsi host numbers us
On 9/5/2015 11:44 PM, Lee Duncan wrote:
Each Scsi_host instance gets a host number starting
at 0, but this was implemented with an atomic integer,
and rollover wasn't considered. Another problem with
this design is that scsi host numbers used by iscsi
are never reused, thereby making rollover mor
Each Scsi_host instance gets a host number starting
at 0, but this was implemented with an atomic integer,
and rollover wasn't considered. Another problem with
this design is that scsi host numbers used by iscsi
are never reused, thereby making rollover more likely.
This patch converts Scsi_host in
4 matches
Mail list logo
