On 02/16/2017 11:23 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 02/16/2017 11:09 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
When sending a TMF via the ioctl interface we should be using
the hi-pri
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 02/16/2017 11:09 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> When sending a TMF via the ioctl interface we should be using
>>> the hi-priority queue instead of the scsi queue to be consisten
On 02/16/2017 11:09 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> When sending a TMF via the ioctl interface we should be using
>> the hi-priority queue instead of the scsi queue to be consistent
>> with overall TMF usage.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reine
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> When sending a TMF via the ioctl interface we should be using
> the hi-priority queue instead of the scsi queue to be consistent
> with overall TMF usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
> ---
> drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_ctl.c | 2 +
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:25:57AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> When sending a TMF via the ioctl interface we should be using
> the hi-priority queue instead of the scsi queue to be consistent
> with overall TMF usage.
Looks fine,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
When sending a TMF via the ioctl interface we should be using
the hi-priority queue instead of the scsi queue to be consistent
with overall TMF usage.
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke
---
drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_ctl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers
6 matches
Mail list logo