Re: [PATCH 0/4] more gdth patches for your amusement

2007-09-25 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 02:17:44PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > This patch looks grate, Thanks. It is very good for the direction > I'm going to. However it does have a smallish conflict with One > of Jeff's patches where he completely removes the 2.4.x support. > > If it is OK with you I will add

Re: [PATCH 0/4] more gdth patches for your amusement

2007-09-25 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On Tue, Sep 25 2007 at 13:56 +0200, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:51:13AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> On top of that I have my own agenda of cleaning the !use_sg code paths and >> getting >> rid of scsi_cmnd abuse, so there is also that. > > This seems l

Re: [PATCH 0/4] more gdth patches for your amusement

2007-09-25 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 11:51:13AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > On top of that I have my own agenda of cleaning the !use_sg code paths and > getting > rid of scsi_cmnd abuse, so there is also that. This seems like a good time to post my own patch that removes the use of ->scsi_done from gdth. I

Re: [PATCH 0/4] more gdth patches for your amusement

2007-09-25 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On Tue, Sep 25 2007 at 10:20 +0200, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 08:25:28PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> OK, we've had these competing patch sets floating around for two months >>> now. Christoph and Jeff, can we get agreement on which is going in? >> Wel

Re: [PATCH 0/4] more gdth patches for your amusement

2007-09-25 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 08:25:28PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >OK, we've had these competing patch sets floating around for two months > >now. Christoph and Jeff, can we get agreement on which is going in? > > Well, my opinion is > > 1) When judging by total amount of positive improvement, Chri

Re: [PATCH 0/4] more gdth patches for your amusement

2007-09-24 Thread Jeff Garzik
James Bottomley wrote: On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 16:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: This is the rest of the stuff checked into the 'gdth' branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/misc-2.6.git As noted before, I'm fine with Christoph's gdth work superceding mine, or whatever. Th

Re: [PATCH 0/4] more gdth patches for your amusement

2007-09-15 Thread James Bottomley
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 16:34 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > This is the rest of the stuff checked into the 'gdth' branch of > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/misc-2.6.git > > As noted before, I'm fine with Christoph's gdth work superceding mine, > or whatever. This was just me p

Re: [PATCH 0/4] more gdth patches for your amusement

2007-07-21 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jeff Garzik wrote: This is the rest of the stuff checked into the 'gdth' branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/misc-2.6.git As noted before, I'm fine with Christoph's gdth work superceding mine, or whatever. This was just me poking around. Hopefully the patches are us

[PATCH 0/4] more gdth patches for your amusement

2007-07-21 Thread Jeff Garzik
This is the rest of the stuff checked into the 'gdth' branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/misc-2.6.git As noted before, I'm fine with Christoph's gdth work superceding mine, or whatever. This was just me poking around. Hopefully the patches are useful for illustratio