Re: [PATCH 0/4] Decouple X86_32 dependency from the ISA Kconfig option

2016-05-01 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 12:17:07PM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:18:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:48:42AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> >Ah, ok, so it's for e

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Decouple X86_32 dependency from the ISA Kconfig option

2016-05-01 Thread William Breathitt Gray
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:18:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: >On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:48:42AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> >Ah, ok, so it's for enabling real hardware, not just a cleanup, right? You >> >might >> >want to pu

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Decouple X86_32 dependency from the ISA Kconfig option

2016-04-13 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:48:42AM -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >Ah, ok, so it's for enabling real hardware, not just a cleanup, right? You > >might > >want to put that info into the boilerplate mail or so. > > > >I'm perfec

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Decouple X86_32 dependency from the ISA Kconfig option

2016-04-13 Thread William Breathitt Gray
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: >Ah, ok, so it's for enabling real hardware, not just a cleanup, right? You >might >want to put that info into the boilerplate mail or so. > >I'm perfectly fine with all the patches that touch x86 code: > > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar > >I

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Decouple X86_32 dependency from the ISA Kconfig option

2016-04-13 Thread Ingo Molnar
* William Breathitt Gray wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 09:26:02AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >What's the practical motivation of this? What exact hardware is this for? > > > >Thanks, > > > > Ingo > > The PC/104 bus is equivalent to the ISA bus regarding software > communication. Many sm

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Decouple X86_32 dependency from the ISA Kconfig option

2016-04-13 Thread William Breathitt Gray
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 09:26:02AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: >What's the practical motivation of this? What exact hardware is this for? > >Thanks, > > Ingo The PC/104 bus is equivalent to the ISA bus regarding software communication. Many small form factor systems have a PC/104 bus where PC/

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Decouple X86_32 dependency from the ISA Kconfig option

2016-04-13 Thread Ingo Molnar
* William Breathitt Gray wrote: > This patchset is based on top of commit 3a3a5fece6f2 ("fs: kernfs: Replace > CURRENT_TIME by current_fs_time()") of the driver-core-testing branch of > the driver-core repository. > > The introduction of the ISA_BUS option in commit b3c1be1b789c > ("base: isa:

[PATCH 0/4] Decouple X86_32 dependency from the ISA Kconfig option

2016-04-11 Thread William Breathitt Gray
This patchset is based on top of commit 3a3a5fece6f2 ("fs: kernfs: Replace CURRENT_TIME by current_fs_time()") of the driver-core-testing branch of the driver-core repository. The introduction of the ISA_BUS option in commit b3c1be1b789c ("base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency") blocks the compilati