Re: [PATCH 0/2] target: 64-bit LUN support

2015-06-11 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 06/10/15 22:56, Hannes Reinecke wrote: Actually, I've been thinking about this. Currently I'm not sure if we should fully embrace this route; after all, 'scsilun_to_int' is meant to be a conversion from the (abstract) LUN number into our internal representation. And as it's internal we're free

Re: [PATCH 0/2] target: 64-bit LUN support

2015-06-10 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 06/10/2015 06:45 PM, Andy Grover wrote: > On 06/09/2015 11:41 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> Hi Nic, >> >> here's now the patchset for making LIO-target support 64-bit LUNs. >> Pretty straightforward, plus an additional patch to remove the >> now obsolete limitation on 256 LUNs per TPG. There had

Re: [PATCH 0/2] target: 64-bit LUN support

2015-06-10 Thread Andy Grover
On 06/09/2015 11:41 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: Hi Nic, here's now the patchset for making LIO-target support 64-bit LUNs. Pretty straightforward, plus an additional patch to remove the now obsolete limitation on 256 LUNs per TPG. There had been a comment in the header that REPORT LUN emulation w

Re: [PATCH 0/2] target: 64-bit LUN support

2015-06-10 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
Hi Hannes, On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 08:41 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Hi Nic, > > here's now the patchset for making LIO-target support 64-bit LUNs. > Pretty straightforward, plus an additional patch to remove the > now obsolete limitation on 256 LUNs per TPG. There had been a > comment in the h

[PATCH 0/2] target: 64-bit LUN support

2015-06-09 Thread Hannes Reinecke
Hi Nic, here's now the patchset for making LIO-target support 64-bit LUNs. Pretty straightforward, plus an additional patch to remove the now obsolete limitation on 256 LUNs per TPG. There had been a comment in the header that REPORT LUN emulation would only support up to one page in payload, but