On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 23:56 -0700, Arun Easi wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, 11:36pm -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 22:16 +, Himanshu Madhani wrote:
> >> Hi Nic,
> >>
> >> Sorry about the delay in response.
> >>
> >> I have tested with RHEL 6.5 and noticed that I
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015, 11:36pm -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 22:16 +, Himanshu Madhani wrote:
Hi Nic,
Sorry about the delay in response.
I have tested with RHEL 6.5 and noticed that IO were not able to complete
with 16M and 32M read/write. IO¹s were getting error
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 22:16 +, Himanshu Madhani wrote:
> Hi Nic,
>
> Sorry about the delay in response.
>
> I have tested with RHEL 6.5 and noticed that IO were not able to complete
> with 16M and 32M read/write. IO¹s were getting error due to Mid-layer
> underflow
>
> With initiator runnin
Hi Nic,
Sorry about the delay in response.
I have tested with RHEL 6.5 and noticed that IO were not able to complete
with 16M and 32M read/write. IO¹s were getting error due to Mid-layer
underflow
With initiator running upstream kernel version 4.2 as well I was seeing
error with Mid-layer repor
Hi Arun & Co,
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 16:17 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 17:48 -0700, Arun Easi wrote:
> > Hi nab,
> >
> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, 1:45am -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> >
> > > From: Nicholas Bellinger
> > >
> > > Hi Arun, Roland & Co,
> > >
> >
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 17:48 -0700, Arun Easi wrote:
> Hi nab,
>
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, 1:45am -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger
> >
> > Hi Arun, Roland & Co,
> >
> > Based upon the feedback from last week, here is a proper
> > patch for target-core to honor a fab
Hi nab,
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, 1:45am -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
From: Nicholas Bellinger
Hi Arun, Roland & Co,
Based upon the feedback from last week, here is a proper
patch for target-core to honor a fabric provided SGL limit
using residual count plus underflow response bit.
Everyt
From: Nicholas Bellinger
Hi Arun, Roland & Co,
Based upon the feedback from last week, here is a proper
patch for target-core to honor a fabric provided SGL limit
using residual count plus underflow response bit.
Everything appears to be working as expected with tcm-loop
LUNs with basic I/O and
8 matches
Mail list logo
