On Mon, May 16, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> > CONFIG_64BIT=y
> It doesn't appear this patch ever landed in Mainline. Olaf, do you have
> plans to submit this patch?
Yes, will do.
Olaf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@
.kernel.org; linux-
> s...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_tablesize on x86
>
> On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 07:48 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > > It's not really architecture independent, is
ect: Re: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_tablesize on x86
>
> On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 07:48 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, James Bottomley wrote:
> >
> > > It's not really architecture independent, is it? Just use the bit
> > > width config.
>
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 07:48 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > It's not really architecture independent, is it? Just use the bit
> > width config.
>
> Again: which one? This driver is not for mips|powerpc|score|sh.
zgrep CONFIG_.*BIT /proc/config.gz
[...]
C
On Wed, Jan 27, James Bottomley wrote:
> It's not really architecture independent, is it? Just use the bit
> width config.
Again: which one? This driver is not for mips|powerpc|score|sh.
Olaf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to ma
ux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > s...@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_tablesize on x86
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 02, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 01, James Bottomley wrote:
> > >
> > > > On
> -Original Message-
> From: Olaf Hering [mailto:o...@aepfle.de]
> Sent: Monday, January 25, 2016 12:35 AM
> To: James Bottomley
> Cc: KY Srinivasan ; Haiyang Zhang
> ; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> s...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] storvsc: u
On Fri, Oct 02, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 20:30 +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
>
> > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
>
> > Um, this is a bit architecture specific (I know Azure is x86, but
> > still). Can you make the define check CONF
On Thu, Oct 01, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 20:30 +, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
> Um, this is a bit architecture specific (I know Azure is x86, but
> still). Can you make the define check CONFIG_32BIT rather than
> CONFIG_X86_32?
According to
; To: KY Srinivasan ; Haiyang Zhang
> > > ; jbottom...@odin.com
> > > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Olaf Hering
> > >
> > > Subject: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_tablesize on x86
> > >
> > > Reducing the sg_tabl
inux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Olaf Hering
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_tablesize on x86
> >
> > Reducing the sg_tablesize allows booting of 32bit kernels in VMs, after
> > commit be0cf6ca301c61458dc4aa1a37acf4f58d2ed3d6 ("
> -Original Message-
> From: Olaf Hering [mailto:o...@aepfle.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 3:07 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan ; Haiyang Zhang
> ; jbottom...@odin.com
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Olaf Hering
>
> Subject: [P
Reducing the sg_tablesize allows booting of 32bit kernels in VMs, after
commit be0cf6ca301c61458dc4aa1a37acf4f58d2ed3d6 ("scsi: storvsc: Set the
tablesize based on the information given by the host")
[5.567138] hv_storvsc vmbus_1: adjusting sg_tablesize 0x800 -> 0x20
Signed-off-by: Olaf Herin
13 matches
Mail list logo