On Tue, 24 July 2012 09:01:41 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 15:24 -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 July 2012 23:45:55 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > >
> > > Have you checked this with the patches in scsi-misc? There's a series
> > > of patches in there that alter
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 15:24 -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Mon, 23 July 2012 23:45:55 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 13:32 -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > > At least two slightly different paths can lead to a NULL pointer
> > > dereference in scsi_prep_state_check and have been
On Mon, 23 July 2012 23:45:55 +0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 13:32 -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > At least two slightly different paths can lead to a NULL pointer
> > dereference in scsi_prep_state_check and have been hit in practice.
>
> Have you checked this with the patches
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 13:32 -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
> At least two slightly different paths can lead to a NULL pointer
> dereference in scsi_prep_state_check and have been hit in practice.
Have you checked this with the patches in scsi-misc? There's a series
of patches in there that alters the w
At least two slightly different paths can lead to a NULL pointer
dereference in scsi_prep_state_check and have been hit in practice.
1.
Call Trace:
[] scsi_setup_blk_pc_cmnd+0x2b/0x170
[] sd_prep_fn+0x568/0xdd0
[] blk_peek_request+0xb4/0x240
[] scsi_request_fn+0x43e/0x4a0
[] __blk_run_queue+0x
5 matches
Mail list logo