On 16/09/2015 16:23, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > I'm trying to cater to the objections that were made to Andy's patch.
> > If you mean the non-UAPI headers, James wanted them to stay in scsi/; if
> > you mean the UAPI headers, Douglas complained about the flat structure
> > of include/linux/.
>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 04:15:46PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> I'm trying to cater to the objections that were made to Andy's patch.
> If you mean the non-UAPI headers, James wanted them to stay in scsi/; if
> you mean the UAPI headers, Douglas complained about the flat structure
> of include/lin
On 16/09/2015 15:39, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> can you just move them to include/linux/ directly?
I'm trying to cater to the objections that were made to Andy's patch.
If you mean the non-UAPI headers, James wanted them to stay in scsi/; if
you mean the UAPI headers, Douglas comp
Hi Paolo,
can you just move them to include/linux/ directly?
Also scsi/scsi.h has some additional ioctl defintions that should be
added to the UAPI scsi_ioctl.h. Otherwise this looks ok to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to ma
Provide a UAPI version of the header in the kernel, making it easier
for interested projects to use an up-to-date version of the header.
The new headers are placed under uapi/linux/scsi/ so as not to conflict
with the glibc-provided headers in /usr/include/scsi.
Cc: Andy Grover
Cc: James Bottoml
5 matches
Mail list logo
