On 07/26/2014 06:17 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:14:35AM -0500, Stephen Cameron wrote:
Hmm, I forgot that that patch was in there, I wasn't trying to keep pushing
it along. From the previous discussion, I got the impression I was simply
wrong, and that this patch wasn
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:14:35AM -0500, Stephen Cameron wrote:
> Hmm, I forgot that that patch was in there, I wasn't trying to keep pushing
> it along. From the previous discussion, I got the impression I was simply
> wrong, and that this patch wasn't needed, so I had meant to drop it, I just
>
I just saw this patch showing up again in the hpsa series, so let's get
the discussiong going on how to proceed again:
I think we can't simply apply the current version as it breaks the intended
semantics in the FC drivers that expect an array with target-wide ressources.
So if we want to go ahea
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 07:21:52PM +, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
wrote:
> Perhaps the SCSI midlayer should keep track of both
> SCSI target port and logical unit queue depths, parse
> the status qualifier if present, and let the host
> template advise on the policy to assume if the
> sta
rnel.org; Vasu Dev; Mike
> Christie
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: break from queue depth adjusting loops when device
> found
>
> On 07/03/2014 07:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:05:57AM -0500, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
> >> From: Stephen
On 14-07-03 01:21 PM, Mike Christie wrote:
On 07/03/2014 12:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:05:57AM -0500, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
From: Stephen M. Cameron
Don't loop through all the devices even after
finding the one we're looking for
The comments in the code s
On 07/03/2014 07:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:05:57AM -0500, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
From: Stephen M. Cameron
Don't loop through all the devices even after
finding the one we're looking for
The comments in the code seem to indicate that we want to modify
the q
On 07/03/2014 12:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:05:57AM -0500, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
>> From: Stephen M. Cameron
>>
>> Don't loop through all the devices even after
>> finding the one we're looking for
>
> The comments in the code seem to indicate that we want to
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:05:57AM -0500, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
> From: Stephen M. Cameron
>
> Don't loop through all the devices even after
> finding the one we're looking for
The comments in the code seem to indicate that we want to modify
the queue depth for all LUNs on a given target.
C
On 14-07-03 11:05 AM, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
From: Stephen M. Cameron
Don't loop through all the devices even after
finding the one we're looking for
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron
Reviewed-by: Robert Elliott
With my scsi_debug testing on Christoph's core-for-3.17
tree I can simulate
From: Stephen M. Cameron
Don't loop through all the devices even after
finding the one we're looking for
Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron
Reviewed-by: Robert Elliott
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_erro
11 matches
Mail list logo
