Re: [PATCH] scsi: ILLEGAL REQUEST + ASC==27 => target failure

2017-09-27 Thread Martin K. Petersen
Martin, > ASC 0x27 is "WRITE PROTECTED". This error code is returned e.g. by > Fujitsu ETERNUS systems under certain conditions for WRITE SAME 16 > commands with UNMAP bit set. It should not be treated as a path > error. In general, it makes sense to assume that being write protected > is a targ

Re: [PATCH] scsi: ILLEGAL REQUEST + ASC==27 => target failure

2017-09-27 Thread Lee Duncan
On 09/27/2017 05:44 AM, Martin Wilck wrote: > ASC 0x27 is "WRITE PROTECTED". This error code is returned e.g. > by Fujitsu ETERNUS systems under certain conditions for > WRITE SAME 16 commands with UNMAP bit set. It should not be > treated as a path error. In general, it makes sense to assume > tha

[PATCH] scsi: ILLEGAL REQUEST + ASC==27 => target failure

2017-09-27 Thread Martin Wilck
ASC 0x27 is "WRITE PROTECTED". This error code is returned e.g. by Fujitsu ETERNUS systems under certain conditions for WRITE SAME 16 commands with UNMAP bit set. It should not be treated as a path error. In general, it makes sense to assume that being write protected is a target rather than a path