Re: [PATCH] move iscsi to a better place in Kconfig

2005-09-09 Thread Mike Christie
Mike Christie wrote: James Bottomley wrote: On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 14:23 -0500, Mike Christie wrote: I think the reason it was a dependency was becuase the transport class manages does the lifetime management/refcounting for the initiators/iscsi_tcp.c session struct. scsi_transport_iscsi allo

Re: [PATCH] move iscsi to a better place in Kconfig

2005-09-09 Thread Mike Christie
James Bottomley wrote: On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 14:23 -0500, Mike Christie wrote: I think the reason it was a dependency was becuase the transport class manages does the lifetime management/refcounting for the initiators/iscsi_tcp.c session struct. scsi_transport_iscsi allocates the scsi_host, a

Re: [PATCH] move iscsi to a better place in Kconfig

2005-09-09 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 14:23 -0500, Mike Christie wrote: > I think the reason it was a dependency was becuase the transport class > manages does the lifetime management/refcounting for the > initiators/iscsi_tcp.c session struct. scsi_transport_iscsi allocates > the scsi_host, and the initiator/i

Re: [PATCH] move iscsi to a better place in Kconfig

2005-09-08 Thread Mike Christie
James Bottomley wrote: Now it looks like we'll have multiple users of the iscsi transport class, the iscsi initiator shouldn't really be a dependency of it. This patch moves iscsi to being an initiator in its own right which selects the transport attributes. I think the reason it was a depende