This is 7 months old. It's been ACK'd by LSI themselves and they even responded
a few months later requesting it be included. It's also obviously correct. Can
we get this included soonish? Please?
On Sep 13, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Ben Collins wrote:
> The assumption that sizeof(long) >= sizeof(res
>-Original Message-
>From: Saxena, Sumit
>Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 10:40 PM
>To: Ben Collins; linux-scsi
>Cc: DL-MegaRAID Linux
>Subject: RE: [PATCH] megaraid: Use resource_size_t for PCI resources,
>not long
>
>
>
>>-Original Message
>-Original Message-
>From: Ben Collins [mailto:be...@servergy.com]
>Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 10:17 PM
>To: linux-scsi
>Cc: Saxena, Sumit; DL-MegaRAID Linux
>Subject: [PATCH] megaraid: Use resource_size_t for PCI resources, not
>long
>
>The assumption
The assumption that sizeof(long) >= sizeof(resource_size_t) can lead to
truncation of the PCI resource address, meaning this driver didn't work
on 32-bit systems with 64-bit PCI adressing ranges.
Signed-off-by: Ben Collins
Cc: Sumit Saxena
Cc: DL-MegaRAID Linux
---
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megara
4 matches
Mail list logo
