On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:37 -0800, Mike Christie wrote:
> Will do. One question though. If a function like
> transport_add_device or transport_setup_device fails,
> how does the caller detect this?
It doesn't; the system runs degraded.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 02:39 -0800, Mike Christie wrote:
The attached patch built against scsi-misc-2.6 moves the
target iSCSI attributes to a new structure representing
a iSCSI session. The reason for doing this is to
create a interface that allows the Sourceforge iSCSI drive
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 02:39 -0800, Mike Christie wrote:
> The attached patch built against scsi-misc-2.6 moves the
> target iSCSI attributes to a new structure representing
> a iSCSI session. The reason for doing this is to
> create a interface that allows the Sourceforge iSCSI driver
> to create a
The attached patch built against scsi-misc-2.6 moves the
target iSCSI attributes to a new structure representing
a iSCSI session. The reason for doing this is to
create a interface that allows the Sourceforge iSCSI driver
to create and setup a session through sysfs (no more
IOCTL at all in our driv
4 matches
Mail list logo