[PATCH] SCSI core: better initialization for sdev->scsi_level

Both scsi_device and scsi_target include a scsi_level field, and the SCSI core makes a half-hearted effort to keep the values equal. Ultimately this effort may be doomed, since as far as I know there is no reason why all LUNs in a target must report the same "ANSI-approved version" number. But for

Re: [PATCH] SCSI core: better initialization for sdev->scsi_level

On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > Alan Stern wrote: > > Both scsi_device and scsi_target include a scsi_level field, and the > > SCSI core makes a half-hearted effort to keep the values equal. > > Ultimately this effort may be doomed, since as far as I know there is > > no reason why al

Re: [PATCH] SCSI core: better initialization for sdev->scsi_level

Alan Stern wrote: > Both scsi_device and scsi_target include a scsi_level field, and the > SCSI core makes a half-hearted effort to keep the values equal. > Ultimately this effort may be doomed, since as far as I know there is > no reason why all LUNs in a target must report the same "ANSI-approved

[PATCH] SCSI core: better initialization for sdev->scsi_level

Both scsi_device and scsi_target include a scsi_level field, and the SCSI core makes a half-hearted effort to keep the values equal. Ultimately this effort may be doomed, since as far as I know there is no reason why all LUNs in a target must report the same "ANSI-approved version" number. But for