Hi Bryant,
On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 19:17 -0400, Bryant G Ly wrote:
> Quoting "Nicholas A. Bellinger" :
>
>
> >
> > So AFAICT for delayed commands, the above patch ends up skipping these
> > three checks subsequently when doing __target_execute_cmd() directly
> > from target_restart_delayed_cmds(),
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 14:35 -0500, Michael Cyr wrote:
> On 5/18/16 12:53 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 17:15 -0500, Michael Cyr wrote:
> >> If a command with a Simple task attribute is failed due to a Unit
> >> Attention, then a subsequent command wi
Quoting "Nicholas A. Bellinger" :
So AFAICT for delayed commands, the above patch ends up skipping these
three checks subsequently when doing __target_execute_cmd() directly
from target_restart_delayed_cmds(), no..?
After pondering this some more, what about moving these checks into
__target
On 5/18/16 12:53 AM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 17:15 -0500, Michael Cyr wrote:
If a command with a Simple task attribute is failed due to a Unit
Attention, then a subsequent command with an Ordered task attribute will
hang forever. The reason for this is t
Hi Michael,
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 17:15 -0500, Michael Cyr wrote:
> If a command with a Simple task attribute is failed due to a Unit
> Attention, then a subsequent command with an Ordered task attribute will
> hang forever. The reason for this is that the Unit Attention status is
> checked for i
If a command with a Simple task attribute is failed due to a Unit
Attention, then a subsequent command with an Ordered task attribute will
hang forever. The reason for this is that the Unit Attention status is
checked for in target_setup_cmd_from_cdb, before the call to
target_execute_cmd, which c
6 matches
Mail list logo