On 06/04/2016 01:25 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Earlier today I discovered a subtle bug in v3 of this patch. It would
be appreciated if you could give v4 a try. The only substantial
difference between v3 and v4 is that a "if (dev->class != &sdev_class)"
test has been added.
(again replying to my
On 05/09/2016 06:50 AM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On 05/05/2016 04:40 PM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
>> On 05/05/2016 03:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 03/28/2016 02:29 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Avoid that the sd driver registers a BDI device with a name that
is still in use. This patch avoid
On 05/05/2016 04:40 PM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On 05/05/2016 03:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 03/28/2016 02:29 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> Avoid that the sd driver registers a BDI device with a name that
>>> is still in use. This patch avoids that the following warning gets
>>> triggered:
>
On 05/05/2016 03:58 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 03/28/2016 02:29 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Avoid that the sd driver registers a BDI device with a name that
>> is still in use. This patch avoids that the following warning gets
>> triggered:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>
> (replying to my own e-mail)
>
>
On 03/28/2016 02:29 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
Avoid that the sd driver registers a BDI device with a name that
is still in use. This patch avoids that the following warning gets
triggered:
[ ... ]
(replying to my own e-mail)
If anyone could review this patch that would be very welcome.
Than
Avoid that the sd driver registers a BDI device with a name that
is still in use. This patch avoids that the following warning gets
triggered:
WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 203 at fs/sysfs/dir.c:31 sysfs_warn_dup+0x68/0x80()
sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/virtual/bdi/8:32'
Workqueue: eve
6 matches
Mail list logo