Re: [PATCH] [1/22] Add new sense_buffer_mask host template field

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 06:48:28AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 00:35 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > sense buffers are something that still needs to be explicitely > > bounced in the scsi layer. Instead of using the global unchecked_isa_dma > > flag define a special fine gra

Re: [PATCH] [1/22] Add new sense_buffer_mask host template field

On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 00:35 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > sense buffers are something that still needs to be explicitely > bounced in the scsi layer. Instead of using the global unchecked_isa_dma > flag define a special fine grained mask for this. > > I decided to use a full dma mask because that is

[PATCH] [1/22] Add new sense_buffer_mask host template field

sense buffers are something that still needs to be explicitely bounced in the scsi layer. Instead of using the global unchecked_isa_dma flag define a special fine grained mask for this. I decided to use a full dma mask because that is most useful for some future infrastructure work I'm doing. N