Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Reducing the SRP initiator failover time

2013-02-08 Thread Sebastian Riemer
On 08.02.2013 10:24, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > On 2/8/2013 12:42 AM, Vu Pham wrote: >> Hello Bart, >> >> Thank you for taking the initiative. >> Mellanox think that this should be discussed. We'd be happy to attend. >> >> We also would like to discuss: >> * How and how fast does SRP detect a path fail

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Reducing the SRP initiator failover time

2013-02-08 Thread Sagi Grimberg
On 2/8/2013 12:42 AM, Vu Pham wrote: It is known that it takes about two to three minutes before the upstream SRP initiator fails over from a failed path to a working path. This is not only considered longer than acceptable but is also longer than other Linux SCSI initiators (e.g. iSCSI an

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Reducing the SRP initiator failover time

2013-02-07 Thread Vu Pham
It is known that it takes about two to three minutes before the upstream SRP initiator fails over from a failed path to a working path. This is not only considered longer than acceptable but is also longer than other Linux SCSI initiators (e.g. iSCSI and FC). Progress so far with improving

[LSF/MM TOPIC] Reducing the SRP initiator failover time

2013-02-01 Thread Bart Van Assche
It is known that it takes about two to three minutes before the upstream SRP initiator fails over from a failed path to a working path. This is not only considered longer than acceptable but is also longer than other Linux SCSI initiators (e.g. iSCSI and FC). Progress so far with improving the