On 12/16/14 16:30, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 12/16/2014 09:32 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Sounds like a good topic, altough I hope we'll see considerable
>> progress before LSF on this item..
>
> Full integration requires a change of the SCSI device model;
> currently struct scsi_device has a
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 04:30:34PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 12/16/2014 09:32 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Sounds like a good topic, altough I hope we'll see considerable
> > progress before LSF on this item..
> >
> Full integration requires a change of the SCSI device model;
> curren
On 12/16/2014 09:32 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Sounds like a good topic, altough I hope we'll see considerable
> progress before LSF on this item..
>
Full integration requires a change of the SCSI device model;
currently struct scsi_device has a fixed type and inquiry data, so
rescan is essent
Sounds like a good topic, altough I hope we'll see considerable
progress before LSF on this item..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Hi all,
I'd like to discusss 'Integrated Unit Attention handling' at LSF/MM
2015.
Currently we're interpreting some Unit Attention codes and send out
uevents, with the hope that some userspace application will make use
of this.
However, some UAs are easily handled within the kernel directly, eg
5 matches
Mail list logo