On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 04:04:36PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:36:39AM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> > Dear LSF committee,
> > I'd like to explicitly request attendance for this discussion
> > :-)
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=135894412908342&w=2
>
>
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 02:12:57PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > "Joel" == Joel Becker writes:
>
> Joel> I'm happy to chat about it. Unfortunately, like Darrick says,
> Joel> sys_dio() coding hasn't happened. I do think we're better off
> Joel> with some kind of explicit API than som
> "Darrick" == Darrick J Wong writes:
Darrick> Is there a newer one than this?
Darrick> https://oss.oracle.com/projects/oracleasm/files/sources/
UEK2 git.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the bod
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 02:09:17PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > "Darrick" == Darrick J Wong writes:
>
> Darrick> and more recently I've theorized that we could add a magic
> Darrick> fcntl/ioctl to make the kernel recognize, say, the first iovec
> Darrick> of a O_DIRECT *{read,write}v
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:36:39AM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> Dear LSF committee,
> I'd like to explicitly request attendance for this discussion
> :-)
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=135894412908342&w=2
"Also, the way I compile the list of requests is from thread
heads
> "Ben" == Ben Myers writes:
Ben> I'm interested in discussing how to pass protection information to
Ben> and from userspace. Maybe Martin could be enlisted for the
Ben> discussion.
I'll be there, obviously.
Ben> I read that some work has already been done in this area but have
Ben> not b
> "Joel" == Joel Becker writes:
Joel> I'm happy to chat about it. Unfortunately, like Darrick says,
Joel> sys_dio() coding hasn't happened. I do think we're better off
Joel> with some kind of explicit API than some magic state on the file.
Joel> I mean, even something like:
Joel> ssize_t
> "Darrick" == Darrick J Wong writes:
Darrick> and more recently I've theorized that we could add a magic
Darrick> fcntl/ioctl to make the kernel recognize, say, the first iovec
Darrick> of a O_DIRECT *{read,write}v call as the PI buffer, which I
Darrick> think is similar to how DIX gets PI d
Dear LSF committee,
I'd like to explicitly request attendance for this discussion
:-)
Joel
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 09:27:35AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:19:59AM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > Boaz Harrosh writes:
> > >>
> > >> For aio we just need to add additio
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:19:59AM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Boaz Harrosh writes:
> >>
> >> For aio we just need to add additional fields to an existing structure.
> >>
> >> So yeah, I'd be interested in that discussion as well.
>
> Sure, it's easy to start there, but then you eventually end u
Boaz Harrosh writes:
>>> I also pondered simply adding a new io_prep_* function + IO_CMD_ code to
>>> libaio
>>> and all the other plumbing necessary to make that happen...
>>>
>>> void io_prep_preadv_pi(struct iocb *iocb, int fd, const struct iovec *iov,
>>>int iovcnt, long
On 02/07/2013 02:33 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 01:16 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> (Again libaio should be changed in concert with Kernel's new API, and we
>> can sacrifice old user-mode performance, with a COMPAT layer. Distro
>> maintainers should consider replacing libaio, toget
On 02/07/2013 02:29 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 02/07/13 13:08, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> (My addition is for support of sg_lists to bsg, in a way that makes Tomo
>> happy
>> I know that qemu was wanting this for a while as well as the multitude of
>> user-mode servers)
>
> Do you think it w
On 02/07/2013 01:16 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On 02/07/2013 02:08 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On 02/07/2013 01:27 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 02/07/2013 11:01 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:40:14AM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:34:49PM -0500, Chuck Le
On 02/07/13 13:08, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
(My addition is for support of sg_lists to bsg, in a way that makes Tomo happy
I know that qemu was wanting this for a while as well as the multitude of
user-mode servers)
Do you think it would help / make sense if sg_alloc_table() would be
modified s
On 02/07/2013 02:08 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 01:27 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 02/07/2013 11:01 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:40:14AM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:34:49PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> On Feb 6, 201
On 02/07/2013 01:27 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 11:01 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:40:14AM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:34:49PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Feb 6, 2013, at 3:24 PM, "Darrick J. Wong"
wrote:
On 02/07/2013 11:01 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:40:14AM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:34:49PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Feb 6, 2013, at 3:24 PM, "Darrick J. Wong" wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 01:51:22PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
Hi,
I'm
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:40:14AM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:34:49PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >
> > On Feb 6, 2013, at 3:24 PM, "Darrick J. Wong"
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 01:51:22PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I'm interes
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:34:49PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>
> On Feb 6, 2013, at 3:24 PM, "Darrick J. Wong" wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 01:51:22PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm interested in discussing how to pass protection information to and from
> >> userspace.
On Feb 6, 2013, at 3:24 PM, "Darrick J. Wong" wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 01:51:22PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm interested in discussing how to pass protection information to and from
>> userspace. Maybe Martin could be enlisted for the discussion.
>>
>> I read that some wo
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 01:51:22PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested in discussing how to pass protection information to and from
> userspace. Maybe Martin could be enlisted for the discussion.
>
> I read that some work has already been done in this area but have not been
> able
Hi,
I'm interested in discussing how to pass protection information to and from
userspace. Maybe Martin could be enlisted for the discussion.
I read that some work has already been done in this area but have not been able
to locate it. It looks like the bio-integrity code already makes it possi
23 matches
Mail list logo
