On 1/16/14 7:12 AM, "Sagi Grimberg" wrote:
>Hey SCSI (and LSF) folks,
>
>I'd like to propose the following topic for upcoming LSF-MM:
>
>T10-PI standard is becoming more and more appealing for storage and
>cloud solutions.
>Since error-detection coding comes with its cost of CPU computation
>ov
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 17:12 +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Hey SCSI (and LSF) folks,
>
> I'd like to propose the following topic for upcoming LSF-MM:
>
> T10-PI standard is becoming more and more appealing for storage and
> cloud solutions.
> Since error-detection coding comes with its cost of CP
Hey SCSI (and LSF) folks,
I'd like to propose the following topic for upcoming LSF-MM:
T10-PI standard is becoming more and more appealing for storage and
cloud solutions.
Since error-detection coding comes with its cost of CPU computation
overhead,
state-of-the-art ASICs offer the ability to
On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:26 +0200, sagi grimberg wrote:
>From:
> sagi grimberg
> To:
> linux-scsi
> ,
> target-devel
>
> Cc:
> Oren Duer
Actually, could you copy lsf...@lists.linux-foundation.org like the CFP
requests? The reason is quite simple
Hey SCSI folks,
I'd like to propose the following topic for upcoming LSF-MM:
T10-PI standard is becoming more and more appealing for storage and
cloud solutions. Since error-detection
coding comes with its cost of CPU computation overhead, state-of-the-art
ASICs offer the ability to offload
T1
5 matches
Mail list logo