On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 14:04 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Iscsitarget-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] iSCSI enterprise target software
> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:35:49 +0900
>
> > The last reason is that user-space cost lik
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Iscsitarget-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] iSCSI enterprise target software
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 18:35:49 +0900
> The last reason is that user-space cost like memory copy. With 1Gbs
> Ethernet, is is not critical. However, with 10G, it is
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 14:01, Vikas Aggarwal wrote:
> And If future IET be visioned as an Enterprise Class Array(Multiple
> Host-Side Adapters ie., FAs + Multiple Device Side Adapters ie., DAs),
> should better be in direct control of all the system-resources without
> being pushed out the kernel.
From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Iscsitarget-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] iSCSI enterprise target software
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:46:32 +0100
> note that on 32 bit servers the kernel side needs to do kmap() on the
> pages anyway, and that a kmap/kunmap series
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 11:48 +0100, Libor Vanek wrote:
> >
> I don't know in detail what are you talking about (if whole disk must
> fit address space) but please consider we're speaking about TBs (10-20
> TB RAID is quite cheap nowadays with 400 GB SATA disks).
so? if you need one map/unmap per
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 19:22 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Iscsitarget-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] iSCSI enterprise target software
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:46:03 +0100
fsync or msync() ? I would imagine the
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 11:33 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 19:22 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [Iscsitarget-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] iSCSI enterprise target software
> > Date: Tue,
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 19:22 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Iscsitarget-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] iSCSI enterprise target software
> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:46:03 +0100
>
> > fsync or msync() ? I would imagine the target
From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Iscsitarget-devel] Re: [ANNOUNCE] iSCSI enterprise target software
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:46:03 +0100
> fsync or msync() ? I would imagine the target mmaping it's backend in
> userspace and using msync() to kick off IO. At
9 matches
Mail list logo
