Re: [GIT PULL] ARM fixes

2014-02-18 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > Almost, but not quite. If we're going to avoid u64, then dma_addr_t > woudl be the right type here because we're talking about DMA addresses. Well, phys_addr_t had better be as big as dma_addr_t, because that's what the resourc

Re: [GIT PULL] ARM fixes

2014-02-18 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:49:03PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Russell King wrote: > > > > One fix touches code outside of arch/arm, which is related to sorting > > out the DMA masks correctly. There is a long standing issue with the > > conversion from PFNs to

Re: [GIT PULL] ARM fixes

2014-02-18 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Russell King wrote: > > One fix touches code outside of arch/arm, which is related to sorting > out the DMA masks correctly. There is a long standing issue with the > conversion from PFNs to addresses where people assume that shifting an > unsigned long left by PA