https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
--- Comment #14 from Ronny Standtke ---
> The revert is upstream as commit bdfe0cbd746aa9
Thanks for the info! I will apply the revert to 4.2.1.
> Especially if you are receiving paid support from the distribution, they are
> much more likely
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
Theodore Tso changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
Theodore Tso changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ty...@mit.edu
--- Comment #12 from Theodo
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
Ronny Standtke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ronny.stand...@gmx.net
--- Comment #11
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
--- Comment #10 from Theodore Tso ---
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:19:02AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> sorry for the delay - I saw the mail Jan Cc'ed me on yesterday. After
> my changes it should not go away and I had tested the original
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 10:19:02AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> sorry for the delay - I saw the mail Jan Cc'ed me on yesterday. After
> my changes it should not go away and I had tested the original eject
> test that it indeed didn't. Either I forgot a case, or the major
> writeback Tejun
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
--- Comment #9 from Christoph Hellwig ---
Hi Ted,
sorry for the delay - I saw the mail Jan Cc'ed me on yesterday. After
my changes it should not go away and I had tested the original eject
test that it indeed didn't. Either I forgot a case, o
Hi Ted,
sorry for the delay - I saw the mail Jan Cc'ed me on yesterday. After
my changes it should not go away and I had tested the original eject
test that it indeed didn't. Either I forgot a case, or the major
writeback Tejun did a little later regressed it.
As I won't have time to look into
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
--- Comment #8 from Theodore Tso ---
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:02:14AM +, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
>
> I can also confirm that this bug is present in latest stable kerne
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:02:14AM +, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
>
> I can also confirm that this bug is present in latest stable kernel (4.1.5)
> and
> reverting commit from comment 6 seems to fix it.
Christoph,
I've sin
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
Maciej Szmigiero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@maciej.szmigiero.name
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
k.kotle...@sims.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@lst.de,
|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
taz-...@latribu.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||taz-...@latribu.com
--- Comment #5
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
--- Comment #4 from konra...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 181971
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=181971&action=edit
lspci -vvnn
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
To unsubscribe f
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
--- Comment #2 from konra...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 181951
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=181951&action=edit
cat /proc/version
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
To unsubsc
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
--- Comment #3 from konra...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 181961
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=181961&action=edit
dmesg
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from th
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101011
--- Comment #1 from konra...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 181941
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=181941&action=edit
uname -a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from
17 matches
Mail list logo
