On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 03:14:45PM -0500, James Smart wrote:
> Myself and several others here at Emulex maintain the code. The
> recommendations look fine. Feel free to post something if you beat
> us to the work.
Great! Thanks for letting me know, James. I will probaby have some
time to look
Alex,
Myself and several others here at Emulex maintain the code. The
recommendations look fine. Feel free to post something if you beat us
to the work.
-- james s
On 12/3/2014 11:05 AM, Alex Thorlton wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:39:40PM +, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
wrot
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 10:39:40PM +, Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
wrote:
> In similar code, mpt3sas and lockless hpsa just call get_cpu_mask()
> inside the loop:
> cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
> for (i = 0; i < h->msix_vector; i++) {
> rc = irq_set
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-scsi-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-scsi-
> ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alex Thorlton
> Sent: Tuesday, 02 December, 2014 3:58 PM
...
> We've recently upgraded our big machine up to 6144 cores, and we're
> shaking out a number of bugs related
Hey guys,
We've recently upgraded our big machine up to 6144 cores, and we're
shaking out a number of bugs related to booting at that large core
count. Last night I tripped a warning from the lpfc driver that appears
to be related to a kzalloc that uses the number of cores as part of it's
size ca
5 matches
Mail list logo
