Re: [0/3] Last 3 patches for bidi support

2007-11-07 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:38:33 +0200 Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06 2007 at 20:25 +0200, Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Boaz Harrosh wrote: > >> [1] > >> I propose a small change to scsi_tgt_lib.c that will make > >> tgt completely neutral to the scsi_data_buf

Re: [0/3] Last 3 patches for bidi support

2007-11-06 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On Tue, Nov 06 2007 at 20:25 +0200, Mike Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> [1] >> I propose a small change to scsi_tgt_lib.c that will make >> tgt completely neutral to the scsi_data_buffer patch. And will >> make it all that more ready for bidi, too. TOMO is this OK? >>

Re: [0/3] Last 3 patches for bidi support

2007-11-06 Thread Mike Christie
Boaz Harrosh wrote: [1] I propose a small change to scsi_tgt_lib.c that will make tgt completely neutral to the scsi_data_buffer patch. And will make it all that more ready for bidi, too. TOMO is this OK? (Can you do without the GFP_KERNEL allocation flag? It could make the code a bit more simpl

[0/3] Last 3 patches for bidi support

2007-11-06 Thread Boaz Harrosh
[1] I propose a small change to scsi_tgt_lib.c that will make tgt completely neutral to the scsi_data_buffer patch. And will make it all that more ready for bidi, too. TOMO is this OK? (Can you do without the GFP_KERNEL allocation flag? It could make the code a bit more simple) [2] scsi_data_buf