Hi James,
I will request additional information from the engineer and will get back to
you as soon as I can.
Thanks.
Heather
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 12:39 PM
To: conway, heather
Cc: 'linux-scsi@vger.kerne
Hi James,
The information that I was provided is that the default for the Invista is
to report back as SCSI-3 compliant.
Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Heather
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 11:00 AM
To: conway, heather
Cc
Hi,
I'd like to request that the enclosed patch to scsi_scan.c be considered for
inclusion in the v2.4.x kernel. This would add support for sparse LUNs and
large LUNs for the EMC Invista product.
Thanks for your consideration.
Heather
<>
scsi_scan_invista.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi,
I'd like to request that the enclosed patch to scsi_devinfo.c be considered
for inclusion in the v2.6.x kernel. This would add support for sparse LUNs
and large LUNs for the EMC Invista product.
Thanks for your consideration.
Heather
<>
scsi_devinfo_invista.patch
Description: Binary data
Adding it to the blacklist worked. Thank you for the help.
Heather
-Original Message-
From: Doug Ledford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 10:40 AM
To: conway, heather
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: LUN skipping in v2.4.x?
"conway, heather&
Hi Folks,
I'm working with a mixture of v2.2.x and v2.4.x hosts in an FC-SW
environment that requires the host to be able to skip LUNs. I've applied
Eric's linux-2.4.1.diff and Doug's scsi241_ey2.diff patches on different
v2.4.x hosts to address the issue of scanning past LUN 7 on v2.4.x.
Has a
Hi Folks,
I'm working with a host running v2.4.0 attached to a storage box with 1
target and multiple LUNs. The host has been allocated 96 devices to one
QLA2200F HBA, but it can only see the first 8 devices (target 0 LUN 0
through LUN 7). Is there a way enable the host to scan past target 0 LU
7 matches
Mail list logo
