Re: Why is (2 < 2) true? Is it a gcc bug?

2014-01-17 Thread Sebastian Riemer
On 17.01.2014 14:55, Dorau, Lukasz wrote: > On Friday, January 17, 2014 2:37 PM Dorau, Lukasz > wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> My story is very simply... >> I applied the following patch: >> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c >> --- a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c >> +++ b/driv

Re: [PATCH] scsi_transport_srp: Fix kernel-doc warnings

2014-01-06 Thread Sebastian Riemer
Sorry but it seems like my e-mail client line-wrapped the patch. Does > the attached patch work better ? The attached patch should be identical > to what I posted except for the line wrapping. I do not see the warnings > mentioned above - maybe these were introduced by the line wrapping ?

Re: [PATCH 07/14] scsi_transport_srp: Add transport layer error handling

2013-06-17 Thread Sebastian Riemer
On 17.06.2013 09:29, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 06/17/13 09:14, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> On 06/17/2013 09:04 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>> I agree that the value of fast_io_fail_tmo should be kept small. >>> Although as you explained changing the SCSI device state into >>> SDEV_BLOCK doesn't hel

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Reducing the SRP initiator failover time

2013-02-08 Thread Sebastian Riemer
On 08.02.2013 10:24, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > On 2/8/2013 12:42 AM, Vu Pham wrote: >> Hello Bart, >> >> Thank you for taking the initiative. >> Mellanox think that this should be discussed. We'd be happy to attend. >> >> We also would like to discuss: >> * How and how fast does SRP detect a path fail