Re: [PATCH] scsi: Resolve some missing-field-initializers warnings

2014-10-17 Thread Rustad, Mark D
The warning appears in W=2 builds. I had another way to silence it by using diagnostic control macros, but those macros were not accepted. Using a single designated initialization also silences it. Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 17, 2014, at 8:26 AM, "Christoph Hellwig" wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct

Re: [RFC-v2 0/4] tcm_vhost+cmwq fabric driver code for-3.6

2012-07-18 Thread Rustad, Mark D
On Jul 18, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> You do have to pay very close attention to some things however. Don't change >> the device identity in any way - even version information, otherwise a >> Windows initiator will blue-screen. I made that mistake myself, so I >> remember

Re: [RFC-v2 0/4] tcm_vhost+cmwq fabric driver code for-3.6

2012-07-18 Thread Rustad, Mark D
On Jul 18, 2012, at 9:00 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:53:38AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 08:42:21AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> >>> If you add support for a new command, you need to provide userspace >>> a way to disable this com

Re: [PATCH] libfcoe: fix section mismatches

2012-07-12 Thread Rustad, Mark D
On Jul 11, 2012, at 4:02 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote: > Fix this warning: > > WARNING: drivers/scsi/fcoe/libfcoe.o(.init.text+0x7c): > Section mismatch in reference from the function init_module() > to the function .exit.text:fcoe_transport_exit() As far as I can see, resolving this issue only requ