On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 08:55:07PM -0500, Larkin Lowrey wrote:
> It just got worse, under heavy sequential write load, all of the drives in
> the array where thrown out of the array and I got a stack trace.
>
> I know I've been able to stress this array without issue but the last time I
> did that
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 04:34:32PM +0200, jgr...@suse.com wrote:
> This series adds XEN pvSCSI support. With pvSCSI it is possible to use
> physical
> SCSI devices from a XEN domain.
>
> The support consists of a backend in the privileged Domain-0 doing the real
> I/O and a frontend in the unpriv
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 08:45:25PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 04:34:32PM +0200, jgr...@suse.com wrote:
> > This series adds XEN pvSCSI support. With pvSCSI it is possible to use
> > physical
> > SCSI devices from a XEN domain.
> >
&g
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 09:23:20AM -0500, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote:
>
> Obviously Dell/EqualLogix addresses this issue or a similar problem
> with their 6.0.6H2 firmware and VMware is urging people to upgrade.
> That may be a EqualLogix controller error fix in which case it isn't
> relevant to tho
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:31:00AM -0800, Lee Duncan wrote:
> On 01/07/2014 12:18 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:53:44PM +0100, Matthias Eble wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have a "persistent reservations for dummies" document I wrote that I
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:53:44PM +0100, Matthias Eble wrote:
>
> > I have a "persistent reservations for dummies" document I wrote that I
> > can send you off list, if you like.
>
> I think I know how PRs work. Yet I'd be happy about your document.
>
I think that document could be helpful for
olaris.
>
> I may take some time this weekend and clean up the bleeding edges
> remaining and make my repo public for people to use...
>
That'd be nice! Looking forward to it..
-- Pasi
> - Rich
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 05:44:35PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 08:13:02PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 05:38:04PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> > >Apparently, only about 4 months.
> > >P17 firmware is out.
> >
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:00:21AM +, bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60644
>
> --- Comment #32 from livea...@live.com ---
> Hi .
>
> This bug is still present in 3.12-rc1 as of today's tests .
>
You might want to try the latest P17
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 08:13:02PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 05:38:04PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> >Apparently, only about 4 months.
> >P17 firmware is out.
> >Tested on a card which was demonstrating the incorrect behavior before,
> &g
s is great news, finally!
Thanks for testing and reporting!
-- Pasi
>- Rich
>
>On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[1]pa...@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:28:58PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> >I'm told that the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 09:41:42PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:35:02PM -0500, Rich wrote:
> >Nope, I'm wrong.
>
> :(
>
> >I flashed P15 on a machine, and the same behavior persisted, right up to
> >and including the &
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:28:58PM -0400, Rich wrote:
>I'm told that the fix won't actually be in until P17, because it involved
>touching a large number of codepaths, but that it will be in P17.
>
That's unfortunate.. so another 5-6 months.
Thanks for the info!
-- Pasi
>- Rich
>
>
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:35:02PM -0500, Rich wrote:
>Nope, I'm wrong.
:(
>I flashed P15 on a machine, and the same behavior persisted, right up to
>and including the "groups of 3 devices light up when I do my own
>smp_write_gpio".
>Whereas if I flash the experimental blob I
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:00:43PM -0500, Rich wrote:
>From the LSI P15 F/W release notes:
>SCGCQ00342805 (DFCT) Â - SlotStatus updates to SES managed Enclosure may
>update incorrect slots
>"Modified FW to use SES diag page 0Ah mapping only if SMP Discover
>DeviceSlotNum is used
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:55:25AM -0400, Rich wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 07:13:15PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:45PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 10, 201
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:15:21PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:00:14PM +, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > This patch to update copyright year to current for principal target core
> > ownership is now
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:55:25AM -0400, Rich wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 07:13:15PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:45PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 10, 201
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 07:13:15PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:45PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> > >> Le M
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:00:55PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > "Ankit" == Ankit Jain writes:
>
> Ankit> Will these patches be merged? Or have they been superseded by
> Ankit> some other patchset?
>
> Sorry, I've been out on vacation.
>
> 2 of the patches are absolutely trivial and
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:14:35PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:45PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:45PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> >> Le Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:47:11 +0300
> >> Pasi Kärkkäinen écrivait:
> >>
&g
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:01:42PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> Le Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:47:11 +0300
> Pasi Kärkkäinen écrivait:
>
> > Any replies from Supermicro/LSI ?
> >
>
> Only loosely related, but Supermicro replaced recently my 846E26 (dual
> expander
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 09:47:17AM -0400, Rich wrote:
> I've got open discussions with both Supermicro and LSI at the moment,
> and have shipped one of them a backplane and HBA to demonstrate this
> since they couldn't replicate it easily in-house.
>
Hello,
Any replies from Supermicro/LSI ?
--
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:43:49PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Pasi" == Pasi Kärkkäinen writes:
>
> Pasi> .. and I probably need to sg_format the backing devices to enable
> Pasi> PI
>
> Yes. Unless the drive is already formatt
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:40:21PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Pasi" == Pasi Kärkkäinen writes:
>
> Pasi> Btw do you know the current status of T10 PI support in md/dm
> Pasi> raid? If I understood correctly there's some support for
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:48:19PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:38:43PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > >>>>> "Pasi" == Pasi Kärkkäinen writes:
> >
> > Pasi> So physically the disk is using 520 bytes/sector (an
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:38:43PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Pasi" == Pasi Kärkkäinen writes:
>
> Pasi> So physically the disk is using 520 bytes/sector (and needs to
> Pasi> support that), but logically the HBA presents 512 bytes/sect
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:38:43PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Pasi" == Pasi Kärkkäinen writes:
>
> Pasi> So physically the disk is using 520 bytes/sector (and needs to
> Pasi> support that), but logically the HBA presents 512 bytes/sect
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:18:57AM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Pasi" == Pasi Kärkkäinen writes:
>
> Pasi> Btw do you know which LSI mpt2sas HBAs support T10 DIF stuff?
> Pasi> (using 520 or 528 bytes/sector drives with checkums).
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:00:55PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > "Ankit" == Ankit Jain writes:
>
> Ankit> Will these patches be merged? Or have they been superseded by
> Ankit> some other patchset?
>
> Sorry, I've been out on vacation.
>
> 2 of the patches are absolutely trivial and
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 20 00 00 00 00
>
> Should enable a single drive's fault LED (drive m+3, by spec above).
>
Great, thanks a lot!
Also let us know when you hear back from Supermicro/LSI ..
-- Pasi
> - Rich
>
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:56 A
stuff in a couple of days..
Otherwise I'll try reading the SFF-8485/SGPIO spec and play with
smp_write_gpio/smp_read_gpio :)
Thanks,
-- Pasi
> - Rich
>
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0300, Harri Olin wrote:
&g
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 03:50:00PM +0300, Harri Olin wrote:
> On 19.8.2012 13:25, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >>To be brief, the sas2ircu toolset works perfectly fine with IT mode
> >>HBAs - just not with passive backplanes AFAICS [e.g. the 846A, versus
> >>the 846EL
g reports about the SAS2008/9211 SGPIO
glitch?
Thanks,
-- Pasi
> - Rich
>
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 09:54:58PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> >> [My apologies if this is the wrong mailing list for this, but it
>
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 09:54:58PM -0400, Rich wrote:
> [My apologies if this is the wrong mailing list for this, but it
> seemed to be the most relevant. Please direct me elsewhere and discard
> if this is OT.]
>
This is a perfectly fine list, hopefully :)
> Hi all,
>
Hello,
> I've been beati
36 matches
Mail list logo
