On 7 Sep 2014, Alan Stern spake thusly:
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2014, Nix wrote:
>
>> I have a brand new Seagate Expansion Desk drive attached to my x86-64
>> desktop. (I also have a 4TiB model of the same drive, but I haven't even
>> unboxed it: there seems little poin
I have a brand new Seagate Expansion Desk drive attached to my x86-64
desktop. (I also have a 4TiB model of the same drive, but I haven't even
unboxed it: there seems little point as long as the 2TiB version doesn't
work.) I am seeing apparently the same problem as Alexandre Oliva
reported in
On 31 Aug 2013, Greg KH said:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:01:56AM +0100, Nix wrote:
>> On 1 Aug 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
>>
>> > Once I noticed that scsi_get_vpd_page() works fine from other function
>> > calls and that it is not 0x89, but already 0x0 that
On 1 Aug 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
> Once I noticed that scsi_get_vpd_page() works fine from other function
> calls and that it is not 0x89, but already 0x0 that fails fixing it became
> easy.
>
> Nix, any chance you could verify it also works for you?
As an aside, this commit
On 1 Aug 2013, Bernd Schubert verbalised:
> On 07/30/2013 11:20 PM, Nix wrote:
>> On 30 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
>>
>>> On 07/30/2013 02:56 AM, Nix wrote:
>>>> On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
>>>>
>>>>> Ple
On 30 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert told this:
> On 07/30/2013 02:56 AM, Nix wrote:
>> On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
>>
>>> Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
>>> for.
>>
>> Did it in private IRC (the advantage of working
On 30 Jul 2013, Douglas Gilbert outgrape:
> Please supply the information that Martin Petersen asked
> for.
Did it in private IRC (the advantage of working for the same division of
the same company!)
I didn't realise the original fix was actually implemented to allow
Bernd, with a different Arec
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert uttered the following:
> On 07/29/2013 03:05 PM, Nix wrote:
>> On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
>>
>>> Hi Nick,
>>>
>>> On 07/29/2013 12:10 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
>>>> arcmsr0: abort device command of scs
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert spake thusly:
> Could you try to run these commands with 3.10.1?
>
> # # check if reporting opcodes works
> # sg_opcodes -v -n /dev/sdX
spindle:/boot# sg_opcodes -v -n /dev/sda
inquiry cdb: 12 00 00 00 24 00
Report Supported Operation Codes cmd: a3 0c 00 00
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert spake thusly:
> On 07/29/2013 03:05 PM, Nix wrote:
>> On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
>>> I tested this patch with ARC-1260 and F/W V1.49, no issues. Also, this
>>> patch is only in 3.10.3, but not yet in 3.10.1.
>>
>> ...
On 29 Jul 2013, Bernd Schubert said:
> Hi Nick,
>
> On 07/29/2013 12:10 PM, Nick Alcock wrote:
>> arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 1
>> arcmsr0: abort device command of scsi id = 0 lun = 0
>> arcmsr: executing bus reset eh.num_resets=0, num_[...]
>>
>> arcmsr0: wait 'abort al
11 matches
Mail list logo