son(s) why that might not be a good idea. Pls apply o/w.
Thanx,
Tomar
--- Nagendra Tomar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello James,
> My understanding is that the scsi_device in SDEV_DEL state
> is there in the scsi_host->devices/scsi_target->devices queue, just
>
creates
> a duplicate sdev in SDEV_RUNNING, then it's the wrong patch. What should
> be considered is where did the resurrection of the sdev go wrong. I
> remember that Hannes did some updates
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=118215727101887&w=2
> but I don't beli
__scsi_device_lookup and __scsi_device_lookup_by_target do not
check for the sdev_state and hence return scsi_devices with
sdev_state set to SDEV_DEL also. It has the following side effects.
We can have two scsi_devices with the same HBTL queued in
the scsi_host->__devices/scsi_target->devices
3 matches
Mail list logo
