[REGRESSION][v4.13.y][v4.14.y] scsi: libsas: allow async aborts

2017-11-16 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hi Christoph, A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0].  After a kernel bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug: 909657615d9b ("scsi: libsas: allow async aborts")   The regression was introduced as of v4.12-rc1, and it still exists in 4.14 mainline

Re: [REGRESSION][Stable][v3.12.y][v4.4.y][v4.9.y][v4.10.y][v4.11-rc1] scsi: storvsc: properly set residual data length on errors

2017-03-28 Thread Joseph Salisbury
ed with REPORTLUN and that works correctly. > > Patch needs to go in current 4.11, it is safe but not necessary in older > kernels. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > Reviewed-by: K. Y. Srinivasan > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig >

Re: [REGRESSION][Stable][v3.12.y][v4.4.y][v4.9.y][v4.10.y][v4.11-rc1] scsi: storvsc: properly set residual data length on errors

2017-03-27 Thread Joseph Salisbury
ed with REPORTLUN and that works correctly. > > Patch needs to go in current 4.11, it is safe but not necessary in older > kernels. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > Reviewed-by: K. Y. Srinivasan > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig >

[REGRESSION][Stable][v3.12.y][v4.4.y][v4.9.y][v4.10.y][v4.11-rc1] scsi: storvsc: properly set residual data length on errors

2017-03-27 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hi Long Li, A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug: commit 40630f462824ee24bc00d692865c86c3828094e0 Author: Long Li Date: Wed Dec 14 18:46:03 2016 -0800 scsi: storvsc: properly set resid

Re: [PATCH] storvsc: use small sg_tablesize on x86

2016-05-16 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Replying to thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/26/1090 > -Original Message- > From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 7:37 AM > To: Olaf Hering > Cc: KY Srinivasan ; Haiyang Zhang > ; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux- >

Re: [4.5-rc4 Regression] qla2xxx: Add irq affinity notification

2016-04-11 Thread Joseph Salisbury
nd did not require any reverts. Thanks for the quick response! Testing results in comment #39: http://pad.lv/1554003 > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Joseph Salisbury > Date: Monday, April 11, 2016 at 11:41 AM > To: Quinn Tran > Cc: Dept-Eng QL

Re: [4.5-rc4 Regression] qla2xxx: Add irq affinity notification

2016-04-11 Thread Joseph Salisbury
needed. > > In the mean time, I will download 4.5 rc4 to re-verify. > > Regards, > Quinn Tran > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Joseph Salisbury > Date: Monday, April 11, 2016 at 10:26 AM > To: Quinn Tran > Cc: Dept-Eng QLA2xxx Upstr

[4.5-rc4 Regression] qla2xxx: Add irq affinity notification

2016-04-11 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hello Quinn, A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug: commit cdb898c52d1dfad4b4800b83a58b3fe5d352edde Author: Quinn Tran Date: Thu Dec 17 14:57:05 2015 -0500 qla2xxx: Add irq affinity no

Re: [PATCH][v3.18.y][3.19.y-ckt][4.0.y] storvsc: Set the SRB flags correctly when no data transfer is, needed

2015-06-05 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 06/05/2015 01:51 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > Hello, > > Please consider including mainline commit > dc45708ca9988656d706940df5fd102672c5de92 in the next v3.18.y, v4.0.y and > 3.19.y-ckt stable releases. It was > included in the mainline tree as of v4.1-rc5. It h

[PATCH][v3.18.y][3.19.y-ckt][4.0.y] storvsc: Set the SRB flags correctly when no data transfer is, needed

2015-06-05 Thread Joseph Salisbury
/bugs/1439780 commit dc45708ca9988656d706940df5fd102672c5de92 Author: K. Y. Srinivasan Date: Fri May 1 11:03:02 2015 -0700 storvsc: Set the SRB flags correctly when no data transfer is needed Sincerely, Joseph Salisbury -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs

[v3.16][v3.17][v3.18][ Regression] scsi: handle flush errors properly

2014-12-10 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hello James, A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug: commit 89fb4cd1f717a871ef79fa7debbe840e3225cd54 Author: James Bottomley Date: Thu Jul 3 19:17:34 2014 +0200 scsi: handle flush errors

Re: please fix FUSION (Was: [v3.13][v3.14][Regression] kthread:makekthread_create()killable)

2014-03-20 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 03/19/2014 03:42 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 03/19, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >> On 03/19, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >>> But please do not forget that the kernel crashes. Whatever else we do, this >>> should be fixed anyway. And this should be fixed in driver. >> drivers/message/fusion/ is obviously bug

Re: please fix FUSION (Was: [v3.13][v3.14][Regression] kthread:makekthread_create()killable)

2014-03-19 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 03/19/2014 03:42 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 03/19, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >> On 03/19, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >>> But please do not forget that the kernel crashes. Whatever else we do, this >>> should be fixed anyway. And this should be fixed in driver. >> drivers/message/fusion/ is obviously bug

Re: [v3.13][v3.14][Regression] kthread:makekthread_create()killable

2014-03-19 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 03/19/2014 07:49 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Oleg Nesterov wrote: If we need the urgent hack to fix the regression, then I suggest to change scsi_host_alloc() temporary until mptsas (or whatever) is fixed. >>> Device initialization taking longer than 30 seconds is possible and is not a >

Re: Subject: [v3.8][v3.11][Regression] [SCSI] sd: Update WRITE SAME heuristics

2013-10-30 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 10/29/2013 03:46 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote: > Hello Joseph, > > On 10/29/2013 08:21 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel bisect, >> it was found that reverting the following commi

Re: Subject: [v3.8][v3.11][Regression] [SCSI] sd: Update WRITE SAME heuristics

2013-10-29 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 10/29/2013 03:41 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote: > On 13-10-29 03:21 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel bisect, >> it was found that reverting the following commit reso

Re: Subject: [v3.8][v3.11][Regression] [SCSI] sd: Update WRITE SAME heuristics

2013-10-29 Thread Joseph Salisbury
On 10/29/2013 03:46 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote: > Hello Joseph, > > On 10/29/2013 08:21 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel bisect, >> it was found that reverting the following commi

Subject: [v3.8][v3.11][Regression] [SCSI] sd: Update WRITE SAME heuristics

2013-10-29 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Hi Martin, A bug was opened against the Ubuntu kernel[0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug: commit 66c28f97120e8a621afd5aa7a31c4b85c547d33d Author: Martin K. Petersen Date: Thu Jun 6 22:15:55 2013 -0400 [SCSI] sd: Update WRITE SAME